Management Myth: I Know How Long the Work Should Take

http://www.stickyminds.com/sitewide.asp?Function=edetail&ObjectType=ART&ObjectId=17967&tth=DYN&tt=siteemail&iDyn=2&mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRouu6TPZKXonjHpfsX67O4rWaC3lMI%2F0ER3fOvrPUfGjI4JScRlI%2BSLDwEYGJlv6SgFSrTFMaVlwrgMXxY%3D

Management Myth 16: I Know How Long the Work Should Take



By Johanna Rothman

Summary: The longer a manager has been away from technical work, the less the manager still knows the technical details. And—as we all know—for software, the details matter. If you have a manager who insinuates himself into your work, ask that manager what he wants. As long as managers trust in their project teams, and as long as those project teams work to earn trust, both sides can work together.

Sally, the project manager, strode confidently into her meeting with John, the CIO. She’d reviewed the roadmap with the product owner and had discussed the risks with the project team. She was sure, based on the first few iterations, that the project was off to a good start. Sure, she knew that projects rarely stayed on course, but this project had a chance of making the dates. The product owner knew how to work the backlog, the team knew how to get to done each iteration, the architect was embedded into the team—this project was cooking! She was happy. As much as she could project into the future—which wasn’t far—this project was going well.

“Hi John. What did you want?” Sally said as she sat down in John’s visitor chair.

“I want you to cut 20 percent off the date for this project.” John replied as he pointed to the final release in the roadmap.

“Well, that’s no problem. We’re agile. You won’t get the last 20 percent of the iterations, so you won’t get the last x percent of the features, but that’s okay.”

“No, you don’t understand. Things shouldn’t take this long to do.”

Sally frowned and said, “I don’t understand. What do you mean, ‘Things shouldn’t take this long to do.’ Do you think people are slacking off? Do you think we are not working hard? What problem are you trying to solve?”

John sighed. “When I was a developer on this system, it didn’t take two months to add a feature like this,” he said as he pointed to the roadmap and to a specific feature. “It shouldn’t take that long. In fact, I added something like that back in the day.”

Sally almost swallowed her tongue. She didn’t want to try to explain that the team had spent almost a week and pulled all of John’s code out for just that feature, because it didn’t work and was unmaintainable.

He continued, “I wrote that code overnight. I know what it takes to write code for this system. It doesn’t take two weeks!”

“John, when we write code now, we write unit tests along with the code. In fact, we write the tests first. We find that when we do that, it helps our design.”

John interrupted Sally. “Well, it makes everything take too long. Stop doing that.”

“No,” countered Sally.

“What do you mean, ‘No.’ I’m your boss,” John said. “What I say goes.”

“Not when you say something that doesn’t get you what you really want,” said Sally. “Look, what you want is to finish this project faster, so you can start the next project, right?”

“Right,” John replied.

“Okay, so you can stop an agile project whenever you want, because we always get to done at the end of an iteration. No problem,” Sally explained. “We have tests so we know the code works. We have releases on the roadmap, and if you want to release before or after a ‘real’ release, we can do that, too. But my job as an agile project manager is to ensure that the team gets to practice their professionalism. I serve the team. I also serve you, but the way I serve you is by facilitating the team. So, no, I’m not going to help you get something you don’t really want. Remember when we tried to make waterfall work, and you used to try to cut 20 percent off the end of every project schedule?”

John leaned back and smiled. “Yes, that worked.”

Sally grinned. “Well, it worked for you the first time. But it killed the team. So, I learned what you did. Since I used deliverable-based planning and incremental approaches with rolling-wave planning, I just gave you an estimate that is 20-30 percent larger after the first time you cut my schedule by 20 percent. I’m not an idiot. I refuse to let the team suffer because you don’t know what it really takes anymore for what the code needs.”

“You inflated your estimates?” John asked. “How dare you!”

“It worked, didn’t it?” Sally retorted.

“Well, it did,” said John. “I liked the releases. But I don’t like it when you pull the wool over my eyes.”

“Well, that’s why we went to agile. You and I both have a lot more transparency. That’s why I say you can stop the project at any time.”

John thought for a few seconds and then said, “How dare you say I don’t know anymore what the code needs!”

“John, when was the last time you really looked in the code? I mean, really looked in the code? You are a CIO. You don’t write code for a living. You don’t. You don’t know what it needs. You cannot possibly estimate what it takes.”

“You are looking at a roadmap, not even an estimate, making a judgment about where we will be in six months, and deciding we are taking too long? You are not being rational. So many things can happen on this project.

“You tell me what you want to have happen, and I will do my best to make it happen. You want to finish this project by a certain date? Great. Make sure you explain to the product owner what features you think are most important. The product owner will work with you. We will work together to deliver the most important features by the date you want. But I will not tell the technical team to stop being professional. That is the quickest way to get a product we cannot ship. And then we cannot go on to the next project.

“So don’t tell me you know how long things should take. We are the project team. We know how long things take. You tell us what project you want us to work on. We will. We will work on the features in order from the product owner. We will be professional. We will not goldplate anything. But don’t tell us how long anything should take. We will tell you how long things will take. Okay?”

“Well, okay,” said John.

How long will the work take?
If you are not familiar with a task, it always seems as if it should take less time to complete than it does, especially if the work is conceptually easy to explain. It’s even worse if a manager has done work similar to that work in the past. But what managers forget is that when they performed that work before, the system was less complex. Or, the environment was easier to work in. Or the language was easier to learn. Something was easier.

The longer the manager has been away from the technical work, the less the manager still knows the technical details. And—as we all know—for software, the details matter.

Does your manager still know what to do?
At one point, maybe that manager did. But the more senior the manager, the less likely that manager knows how to perform the work anymore. Do not allow managers who don’t know the technical work to influence the project schedule or the technical environment. People who don’t perform technical work should not change the project schedule or buy technical tools. It’s fine if those people provide a monetary ceiling—fiduciary responsibility makes sense. But making the final decision? That’s up to the people who do the work.

The more you allow the manager to influence your work, the worse your work environment may become.

Managers don’t always ask for what they want.
If you have a manager who insinuates himself into your work, ask that manager what he wants. In this case, John wants this project to be done faster so the next project can be started earlier. Sometimes, managers want to release earlier, especially if they are not using agile approaches. Whatever the case, the project team always has options.

It’s okay for a manager to want a project to end early. Managers can want anything. It’s how they act on those wishes that might be a problem. As long as managers trust in their project teams, and as long as those project teams work to earn trust, both sides can work together.

Cantera Dreams: Americans Underground in Mexico

“There are 20 million Mexicans trying to become American and there’s one American trying to become Mexican. We don’t even know how to deal with that! We don’t have the paperwork for that!”

http://www.xiquarterly.com/2013/05/17/cantera-dreams/

Cantera Dreams: Americans Underground in Mexico

Note: This article is being released as a preview of issue three of XI Quarterly. If you like what you read here, you’ll love reading the whole issue, titled Futbol Americano, and featuring 11 great stories about the connections between soccer in North America and the game in the rest of the Americas. Subscribe now!

Pumas Cantera

One hundred feet below ground, Pumas is developing the next generation of stars. The team’s massive youth development center may be in the middle of Mexico City, but, built in the bowels of a former quarry, it is hidden from the metropolis that surrounds it. Where once workers excavated stone that was used to pave the streets of Mexico City, today Pumas carves future stars from the raw material — the hundreds of players — that makes up its famed youth program. Cantera, the Spanish word for quarry is also the word for the youth programs of professional teams throughout the Spanish-speaking world, including perhaps the most famous cantera in Mexico: that of Pumas.

At street level, the entrance to the Pumas cantera is unremarkable. Located in a quiet, middle class neighborhood, a gate manned by several security guards is the only indication that something special lies within. From street level, a windy road leads down to the base of the carved-out former quarry. After a short trip through a tunnel (originally built to shuttle stone out of the quarry) the main field of the cantera is visible. An oasis of green grass in a sea of gray rock, the cantera is clearly not the first inhabitant of this space. Hundred foot walls of stone make the field, which is surrounded by a gym, a cafeteria, and administrative offices, feel like a world completely separate from Mexico City. A set of narrow stone stairs leads even further down, to a second full-size grass field. Next to it are several smaller dirt fields.

There, on those dirt fields, Pumas held tryouts in December. The tryouts were not in themselves remarkable: As one of the most successful Mexican clubs in developing youth players, Pumas often holds such events, looking for talented young players. But among the group trying out this week were five players who had come not from Mexico City or other parts of Mexico, but from the United States.

One of the American kids was a soft-spoken, skinny 16-year-old named Daniel Olea. Born and raised in Escondido, a city 30 miles northeast of San Diego, he had come to Mexico to pursue his dream of catching on with a professional team. Although Olea’s parents are from Mexico, he had never been to the country before. If he were to make it with Pumas, he would have to do so in an environment thousands of miles from home, 100 feet below ground.

Pumas TryoutDaniel Olea (center) along with other Mexican-Americans trying out at Pumas

Daniel Olea is just one of many Mexican-American kids who have travelled south in recent years, hoping for a professional career in Mexico. A list that users of the website BigSoccer.com maintain is striking for its size (they counted 85 players eligible for the U.S. national team at the start of the 2011-2012 Mexican league season) as well as the difficulty they have in keeping it up to date. Players travel from the United States to Mexico, especially at the youth level, with amazing regularity. Why are Mexican clubs today recruiting Mexican-American players so heavily? A confluence of events, sporting and geopolitical, has led to this situation.

In the United States, the second half of the 20th century and the early part of the 21st have seen two relevant trends: the concurrent growth of youth soccer and the Latino population in the United States. From 1970, when soccer was in its infancy in the United States, the sport has grown to nearly 14 million players today, according to the Sports and Fitness Industry Association. Meanwhile, the Latino population of the United States grew from 9.6 million in 1970 (4.7 percent of the total population at the time) to 50.5 million in 2010 (16 percent of the total), according to Princeton scholars Douglas Massey and Karen Pren. A majority of the Latino population in the United States today has family roots in Mexico, and they form the population among which Mexican clubs are finding success recruiting young players.

Youth soccer has grown tremendously over the past 40 years in the United States, and has developed into a uniquely American system. In the United States, autonomous youth clubs made up of largely affluent players have long been the core participants in youth soccer. Much of the growth of youth soccer in the post-World War II period took place in newly growing suburbs, where affluent parents signed their kids up for this new sport. A system of elite clubs developed, many of which charge high fees. These fees, on top of travel, equipment, and other associated expenses, often total thousands of dollars per year, limiting those who are able to take part in this world of elite youth soccer. In his book, “How Soccer Explains the World,” Franklin Foer writes that the sport in the United States “inverts the class structure of the game” that exists in most of the world.

While youth soccer has grown tremendously over the past half century, the professional game has experienced many ups and downs. The meteoric rise of the NASL in the 1970s was followed by its spectacular collapse in the 1980s. Indoor and semi-professional outdoor soccer were the only options for much of the 1980s and early 1990s. And the recent steady growth of MLS has come only after early years in which it was not clear that the league would survive. As a result, the best youth players in the United States have long been developed in autonomous youth clubs, made up of mostly affluent children, totally disconnected from the professional game.

At the same time that youth soccer was growing in affluent suburbs in the United States, the second half of the 20th century saw an incredible rise in immigration from Latin America. For decades, these immigrants, the majority of whom are low-skill workers from Mexico, have quickly found work building houses, mowing lawns and caring for the children of the growing affluent populations who were moving into new suburbs. Many settled in the United States and in recent years their children and grandchildren have taken up soccer in large numbers.

Today, in areas with large Latino populations, there are two major groups of children who play soccer: affluent suburbanites and working-class Latinos. They don’t always play together: Hugo Salcedo, who has over 30 years experience working for FIFA, U.S. Soccer and MLS, estimates that in Los Angeles alone there are around 40 unaffiliated leagues that cater primarily to the Latino community. Recognizing that many players have been ignored, youth clubs affiliated with USSF have worked to bring in more Latino players. Teams have begun to offer scholarships to allow some talented Latino players from modest backgrounds who would not otherwise be able to afford the annual fees to play for elite clubs. MLS teams have set up youth programs in recent years and several have moved toward the elimination of costs for their players, though the financial realities continue to be a barrier to the participation of talented Latino players. Tony LePore, director of scouting for the U.S. Soccer Development Academy system, recently told Soccer America that while 23 of 80 Academy teams are fully funded, “we have a long way to go.”

At the national team level, the appointment of Colombian-born Wilmer Cabrera to be the under-17 national team coach in 2007 was seen as recognition that the U.S. Soccer system as a whole had done a poor job in reaching out to Latino players. As U.S. Soccer president Sunil Gulati said at the time, “The fact that he is bilingual, from a Latin-American community, is a plus.” Although Cabrera ended his tenure with the under-17s in 2012, the appointment of Jurgen Klinsmann as the senior national team coach in 2011 has heralded a reorientation towards Latino players. Klinsmann made clear soon after his appointment that he wanted to bring in more Latino players, saying in his first press conference as national team boss, “There’s so much influence coming from the Latin environment over the last 15-20 years. It also has to be reflected in the U.S. National Team.”

Despite these efforts, the youth system in the United States continues to see many talented Latino players slip through the cracks. And Mexican clubs, seeing a vast country sitting just across its northern border with many talented young players who also happen to have Mexican citizenship, have swooped in.

* * *

Daniel Olea has not had the easiest of childhoods. The son of Mexican immigrants living north of San Diego, he currently lives with his stay-at-home mother, Reyna Garcia, and stepfather, Javier Arias, who works at a local Subway restaurant. His parents work to keep him out of trouble, and soccer has been the main tool for doing so.

Daniel Olea has loved soccer for as long as he can remember. His mother recalls that “from four years old, his life has been soccer. He’s always had a ball with him.” Growing up around his father and older brothers, Olea was never far from a soccer ball, and he has long harbored dreams of a professional career. His mother remembers Daniel and a cousin as young kids saying they wanted to be professional soccer players. “He’s always said he wants to be someone. He’s always had the idea of becoming a professional player since he was 10 years old.”

Olea’s mother and biological father separated when he was young, and his brother Eric, six years his senior, took on a fatherly role with young Daniel. “When my dad left, he was the one who took charge and he was like another dad to me,” says Daniel. Eric took his younger brother to soccer games, and the kid soon impressed those around him. Growing up in the Mexican-American community in Escondido, as Olea got older he began to be recruited by various teams in unaffiliated “Mexican” leagues. He was so good, his mother recalls, that team after team would attempt to recruit him. “Wherever we went, wherever he played, people would ask us if he would play for their team.”

Olea developed his talent playing for these unaffiliated teams. He had never played for an affiliated team until two years ago, when he got connected with the local club, known as FC Heat. His mother and stepfather were concerned about the cost, but the club, which has a policy of offering financial aid to all who need it, offered to waive his fees.

While at the Heat, Olea has blossomed. Coach Carlos Hernandez has taken the youngster under his wing, and under his guidance Olea has developed into a skillful forward, with guile and inventiveness rarely seen in a 16-year-old. With this burgeoning talent, Olea began to attend tryouts for professional teams a couple of years ago. He attended a Copa Alianza event, in which scouts from Mexican clubs and the Mexican national team look for players in the United States, as well as tryouts held by the Xolos in San Diego. He impressed the Tijuana team so much that they invited him to train with them in 2012. This training, he says, helped him to improve as a player. “Before I went there, I was normal. But after, I was at a whole different level,” he says. The travel time to practices with the Xolos (Tijuana is an hour from Escondido) eventually proved too difficult, and he had to give up on this dream after six months. Though Olea was disappointed, his mother told him “Look, if becoming professional is for you, you’ll get another chance.”

This chance came at a September 2012 tryout organized by the San Diego-based amateur club Sudaca, whose director of coaching brought up scouts from Pachuca as well as lower-division Zacatepec. In this two-day tryout, Olea impressed the visiting Pachuca scouts. They suggested that he work with Jesus Cardenas, a former professional player in Mexico and the United States who now dedicates himself to training young players north of the border and connecting them to clubs south of it. The club saw talent in him and thought that after a few months of intensive work with Cardenas, he could come down to Mexico for a second tryout with the club there.

Working with Olea over several months, Cardenas was impressed by the young player’s talent. Cardenas insists that American-based young players like Daniel Olea have the ability to make it with Mexican clubs, but the typical training schedules do not prepare young players for professional careers. “In terms of talent, you can compare players here to those in Mexico,” he says. “But the difference is the training, simply because in Mexico young players practice every day and in the United States we don’t have that amount of time with the kids.”

In December, Cardenas arranged a trip to Mexico for Olea and several other young players who aspired to professional careers. The trip was originally scheduled to include tryouts at Pumas and Pachuca, but the latter was cancelled after the club’s goalkeeper coach Miguel Calero suddenly and tragically died at age 41. That meant that Olea had only one chance to catch the eye of Mexican coaches who might offer him a contract.

I asked Olea what it felt like when he first arrived at the Pumas cantera. How did he feel, descending into the bowels of that imposing facility? Was he nervous? “No,” he told me. “I felt like I just wanted to be there. Like it was for me.”

* * *

At the same time that the youth soccer structure in the United States has allowed talented young Latino players to slip through the cracks, Mexican professional clubs have been increasing their investment in scouting and youth development. The tremendous growth of Mexican professional soccer in the second half of the 20th century and early part of the 21st has given clubs resources to invest in future talent, including from the United States.

There are many reasons for the increased focus of Mexican clubs on youth, but one involves a chain of events that begins with the many Mexican citizens who headed north to the United States in the post-World War II period. The establishment of a large U.S.-based Mexican and Mexican-American population, many of whom find a connection to their homeland through soccer, has helped teams throughout Mexico. The teams have profited tremendously, selling merchandise, television rights and tickets to a constant stream of friendly matches staged in the United States.

As a result of this commercial success (not to mention the millions they make within Mexico), Mexican teams have grown rich and have been able to purchase some of the most talented players in the Western Hemisphere. Bringing in these stars from countries such as Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, Colombia and beyond began to worry some in the Mexican federation, who grew concerned that young Mexican players were being overlooked for expensive foreign signings. In response, the Mexican federation put into place the so-called 20/11 rule in 2005, which required teams to give their under-21 players at least 1000 minutes of playing time per season. The rule was phased out in 2011, deemed no longer necessary after it played a large role in focusing teams on youth development, something teams throughout Mexico now do more than ever before.

As Ramon Villa-Zevallos, head coach of the Pumas under-17 team, put it to me at the December tryout, “Here at Pumas, we have a long tradition of developing youth players. Before, almost no one else produced young players. Now, the competition is fierce. … Pachuca, Chivas, Pumas, everyone is doing a good job developing young players. Everyone is looking anywhere they can to bring in good young players.” And with teams throughout Mexico flush with cash and looking far and wide for the next “Chicharito” Hernandez, it perhaps isn’t surprising that their search has taken them north of the border.

Today, young Mexican-American players can be found on the rosters of teams throughout Mexico. Several teams have made the strongest effort to recruit in the United States. These include Tigres and the Xolos, two teams close to the border (Tigres in Monterrey, a little over two hours from Texas, and the Xolos in Tijuana, just south of San Diego). For these teams, recruiting players in the United States is simple, requiring only a quick trip across the border. Roberto Cornejo, assistant general manager of the Xolos, speaking of current star Joe Corona and top youth prospect Alejandro Guido, both of whom spent much of their childhood in San Diego, told me, “These guys are hometown boys. We consider San Diego our hometown as well.” The Xolos have set up two youth academies in the San Diego region, with the hope of finding “a few new Joe Coronas. San Diego as a region has a lot of talent.”

It’s not just border teams that are recruiting players in the United States. Clubs throughout Mexico have done so, with Santos Laguna, Chivas, Pachuca and Pumas leading the way. The reasons for this increase are many, but the most fundamental reason is the improved standard of play in the United States. Victor Nava, assistant coach of the Pumas reserve team, says, “We’ve seen that players in the United States have a lot of quality.”

Mexican-American players in the United States are not only talented, but also have the advantage of having dual citizenship. Limits on foreign players in the Mexican league don’t apply to these players, giving clubs an extra impetus to recruit them. As Fernando Parra, vice president of Zacatepec, a lower division team with several Mexican-Americans on its books, told me, “many teams have looked for young players who can get dual citizenship and come here to play.” The realization, then, that these players are, for sporting purposes, identical to those living in Mexico has opened up the territory in which Mexican scouts can look for talent. Unlike young players from other parts of Latin America, who have limits placed upon them by the Mexican federation and whose signing often requires a complicated visa process, the recruitment of Mexican-American players involves few bureaucratic hurdles. Players scouted today in the United States can be on a plane next week to practice with a Mexican team.

With talent and Mexican citizenship, these players have become a hot commodity for Mexican clubs. As an investment strategy, the economics of signing Mexican-American youth players makes sense. While clubs have to pay to send scouts on trips to the United States, compared to the potential payoff — the onfield benefit of finding the next Joe Corona and/or the financial windfall from selling such a talented player — these costs are minimal, especially for wealthy Mexican clubs with money to burn.

The cost of signing Mexican-American players is also low because most are not signed to professional contracts with their American teams. Because of the particular youth system that has developed in the United States in which youth clubs are often separate from professional clubs, young players rarely have professional contracts and thus can be signed for free. Marco Garces, head of scouting for Pachuca, tells me, “It’s very interesting for us in the U.S. There are forty million Latin Americans, some of them play really well. And they’re not attached to anyone.”

Even as MLS teams have set up youth academies, only around 50 players have been signed to professional contracts under the league’s Homegrown Player Rule. The rest remain free to leave their American team at any moment to sign with a Mexican club. Garces is dumbfounded by this situation. “They don’t ask for compensation,” he tells me. “It’s weird. I can go and watch the Galaxy train and take their players.” Ramon Villa-Zevallos echoes the sentiment: “We go to the Dallas Cup and we see a whole world of talent. And in the United States, there’s no professional youth system. It ends up being really cheap to bring players here.”

There are many reasons why youth players in the United States are not signed to professional contracts, including labor laws affecting the employment of minors and a strict separation between amateur and professional status that the college system uses as a means to determine eligibility. For years, when the only step beyond youth soccer in the United States was the college game and the vast majority of youth soccer players came from the type of affluent families who would insist on their children attending college, this system was rarely called into question. But as the children of working-class Latinos have come to make up a larger portion of the youth soccer players in the United States and as U.S. Soccer and MLS have made more of an effort to professionalize the youth game in order to produce top quality players, the cracks in the system are becoming more and more apparent.

Mexican clubs, acting purely in their own self-interest, have been among the first to see these cracks, and figure out how to take advantage of them. As Villa-Zevallos puts it, “there are a lot of players in the United States who are lost.” He continues: “in the United States, they charge you to play. So players come to Mexico in search of their dream.”

* * *

Daniel Olea’s longstanding dream of becoming a professional player was now closer than ever. After three days of training separately on the dirt fields, Olea and the rest of the trialists were given the opportunity to play against the Pumas under-17 team. As the group of hopeful young players trooped up the stone steps to the main field, nervousness was apparent on their faces.

While the Pumas under-17s were dressed in matching gear, the trialists’ mismatched shorts and t-shirts gave them away as the cobbled-together group that they were. The game started as one might expect, with Pumas dominating. A tricky left winger dribbled around several of the trialists, making them look silly. Pumas scored several goals, and after the first half, none of the trialists looked anywhere near the level of their opponents.

Olea had been on the bench throughout the first half, but was put on to start the second. Played wide on the left, his impact was immediate. Although he normally plays as a forward, his technical ability was immediately apparent. Like the Pumas left winger in the first half, Olea came on and quickly generated a ton of trouble for the right side of the Pumas defense.

Halfway through the second half, Olea spotted a poor touch from the Pumas right back and he rushed in to take the ball. Forty yards from goal, he looked up and saw two defenders in his way. He faked left. One of the defenders bit on his fake, giving Olea space to put the ball between him and his teammate. Splitting the two defenders, he picked his head up and saw the goalkeeper off his line. His right foot went back and he struck the ball cleanly. Up it went, high in the air. The keeper backpedaled, scrambling to catch up to the quickly traveling ball. But it was too late. The ball came down just in time and went straight into the back of the net.

Olea had just split two defenders and chipped the goalie from 35 yards. Everyone around — coaches, players, and other observers — began whispering to each other.

After the game, a Pumas official saw Jesus Cardenas, who was accompanying the American players. He walked over to him and whispered in his ear. “The coaches like Olea.”

In part, the reason that Mexican clubs have, in some ways, done a better job of scouting Mexican-Americans than has the U.S. youth soccer system is a question of economics: as hugely profitable businesses, Mexican clubs have large amounts of money to spend on youth development, allowing them to travel throughout the United States looking for young talent.

18 year-old Tren Biswell, who lives in a rural part of California, was scouted by several Mexican clubs at a U.S.-based tryout, and traveled to Pachuca last summer for a week of training. He told me, “There are so many people in the United States, so many soccer players, and so many get overlooked. … You’ll never see a U.S. national team scout in Visalia.” (Biswell could not sign a deal with Pachuca as he does not have a Mexican passport, leading Marco Garces to exclaim, “There are 20 million Mexicans trying to become American and there’s one American trying to become Mexican. We don’t even know how to deal with that! We don’t have the paperwork for that!”)

Despite the vast reach of Mexican clubs into U.S. youth soccer, several scouts and coaches insist there are many areas for improvement. Most of the tryouts in United States are arranged today through personal connections. As Marco Garces describes the situation, “As long as there are invitations and something happening, we try to go watch. But there’s not a very good structure for how we choose to go to different places and we need to improve in that.”

Some teams are developing a structure by setting up youth teams in the United States. The Xolos have done so in the San Diego area and Pumas now has youth academies in San Diego, Los Angeles, and San Antonio. These youth academies are new and it remains to be seen how effective they become in funneling players toward the parent clubs in Mexico.

What has become clear, though, is that this recruitment of young players raises many ethical issues. Right now, the informal structure of the movement of Mexican-American players to Mexico has led some with less than noble intentions to take advantage of the system. Daniel Pulido, a young player from San Diego who is currently training with lower-division Zacatepec hoping to earn a contract, told me sheepishly how several years ago he paid $5,000 to a so-called agent who promised to get him trials with several teams in Mexico. Instead, he and several other youngsters were taken to Mexico, where they played a few friendlies against less-than-top-notch opposition. The agent then took off and was never seen again.

Although it is clearly legal for young Mexican-Americans with dual citizenship to travel to Mexico, the ethics of the movement of these players is less clear. Are teams in Mexico giving a chance to players in the United States who are ignored in their home country? Or are these wealthy teams taking advantage of vulnerable youngsters, promising them a future as a professional player, which may or may not ever occur, all the while enriching the scouts, coaches and team officials who profit from their recruitment?

Carlos Hernandez, Daniel Olea’s coach at FC Heat, worries about kids giving up on their academic careers to pursue a soccer dream that is a long shot at best. Hernandez has a reputation for telling them what they don’t want to hear. “I do have the reputation for wanting to send them to school,” he says. “Of course I want to send them to school! If I can send them to school and get a scholarship playing soccer, that’s a perfect world.”

Hernandez worries about kids who give up on their educations to head south to Mexico. Olea is a perfect example, he tells me. “Olea does not like school. He loves soccer. Right now he’s not doing well in school because he’s focusing on going [to Mexico].” Hernandez says that too many players “have this idea, because of the exposure on TV, these guys go and they make it big. My job is to bring them down to reality. I say, ‘What if you don’t make it? How many guys tried out this year? Maybe 100? Maybe 200? How many guys made it to the first team? Not many. So do the percentages, it’s not going to happen.’”

There are plenty of stories of players who have left school in the United States, gone to Mexico chasing a dream, failed and returned home with few options for their future. Hernandez says he knows numerous cases of players who have gone to Mexico full of hope and returned with little to show for their time abroad. Many of them now work low-paying jobs and play in “Mexican” leagues in San Diego. Hernandez has a name for them: “legends of Sunday league.”

It is only a question of time before these ethical issues come to the fore, as nearly everyone I talked to agreed that the number of Mexican-American players in Mexico will only increase in the future with more and more clubs realizing that there is a cheap source of talent just north of the border. The idea of recruiting Mexican-American players, says Ramon Villa-Zevallos, “is no longer a secret.”

* * *

One day after Daniel Olea had scored a goal against the Pumas under-17s, the tryout wrapped up. Olea and other players at the Pumas cantera for the tryout milled about, waiting to hear their fate.

Meanwhile, in the Pumas offices several coaches and officials huddled, making decisions about which players would be offered contracts with the team. The head of the cantera, Jorge Valtonra, sitting at the head of the table asked two coaches who had come in to offer their judgments on the players who were trying out. “Is there material there or not?” he asked.

“Yes,” they said. “Two ‘97s from Veracruz.” They discussed arrangements for those players’ school and housing, and the meeting appeared close to wrapping up.

“Anyone else?” asked Valtonra. “What about those kids from the United States?”

“Yes,” said one of the coaches. “The ’96 kid, Olea.”

An hour later, the trialists were called by the coaches to the field. The coaches thanked them for their effort throughout the week. They then asked Daniel Olea and the two kids from Veracruz to sit on the stone terraces to the side of the field. As the three waited, the coaches told the rest of the group that Pumas would not be signing them. With hard work, they offered, perhaps they could return in the future and have another chance.

The coaches then called the three remaining players over to them. They gave them the news: Pumas liked them and wanted to offer them each a contract. The coaches said the club would be in touch, and offered pats on the back and congratulations.

Having received the news that would change the trajectory of his life, Olea walked over to Jesus Cardenas. Congratulations, Cardenas offered. Olea simply smiled.

* * *

Daniel Olea is now back in San Diego, practicing with the Heat and biding his time until he can return to Pumas. His parents have insisted that he finish his junior year of high school before returning to Mexico full time in the summer. Olea is itching to go and says that, though he’ll miss his family, he is ready for this next phase. Reyna Garcia, his mother, confided to me that she’s worried about him. He’s still a young kid, she tells me, and he’ll be so far from home. Despite her concerns, she’s willing to let her son go, to give him a chance to pursue his dream south of the border, in the country she left decades earlier.

If Daniel succeeds with Pumas, it will bring many changes to his family. The most immediate, his mother told me, is her loyalty. “I’m a Cruz Azul fan,” she told me. “But if my son makes it at Pumas, well, I guess I’ll just have to get a Pumas shirt.”

If you like to read good writing about North American soccer, you may wish to support XI and subscribe to the quarterly print edition.

My Medical Choice by Angelina Jolie – NYTimes.com

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/opinion/my-medical-choice.html?_r=0

My Medical Choice by Angelina Jolie

LOS ANGELES

MY MOTHER fought cancer for almost a decade and died at 56. She held out long enough to meet the first of her grandchildren and to hold them in her arms. But my other children will never have the chance to know her and experience how loving and gracious she was.

We often speak of “Mommy’s mommy,” and I find myself trying to explain the illness that took her away from us. They have asked if the same could happen to me. I have always told them not to worry, but the truth is I carry a “faulty” gene, BRCA1, which sharply increases my risk of developing breast cancer and ovarian cancer.

My doctors estimated that I had an 87 percent risk of breast cancer and a 50 percent risk of ovarian cancer, although the risk is different in the case of each woman.

Only a fraction of breast cancers result from an inherited gene mutation. Those with a defect in BRCA1 have a 65 percent risk of getting it, on average.

Once I knew that this was my reality, I decided to be proactive and to minimize the risk as much I could. I made a decision to have a preventive double mastectomy. I started with the breasts, as my risk of breast cancer is higher than my risk of ovarian cancer, and the surgery is more complex.

On April 27, I finished the three months of medical procedures that the mastectomies involved. During that time I have been able to keep this private and to carry on with my work.

But I am writing about it now because I hope that other women can benefit from my experience. Cancer is still a word that strikes fear into people’s hearts, producing a deep sense of powerlessness. But today it is possible to find out through a blood test whether you are highly susceptible to breast and ovarian cancer, and then take action.

My own process began on Feb. 2 with a procedure known as a “nipple delay,” which rules out disease in the breast ducts behind the nipple and draws extra blood flow to the area. This causes some pain and a lot of bruising, but it increases the chance of saving the nipple.

Two weeks later I had the major surgery, where the breast tissue is removed and temporary fillers are put in place. The operation can take eight hours. You wake up with drain tubes and expanders in your breasts. It does feel like a scene out of a science-fiction film. But days after surgery you can be back to a normal life.

Nine weeks later, the final surgery is completed with the reconstruction of the breasts with an implant. There have been many advances in this procedure in the last few years, and the results can be beautiful.

I wanted to write this to tell other women that the decision to have a mastectomy was not easy. But it is one I am very happy that I made. My chances of developing breast cancer have dropped from 87 percent to under 5 percent. I can tell my children that they don’t need to fear they will lose me to breast cancer.

It is reassuring that they see nothing that makes them uncomfortable. They can see my small scars and that’s it. Everything else is just Mommy, the same as she always was. And they know that I love them and will do anything to be with them as long as I can. On a personal note, I do not feel any less of a woman. I feel empowered that I made a strong choice that in no way diminishes my femininity.

I am fortunate to have a partner, Brad Pitt, who is so loving and supportive. So to anyone who has a wife or girlfriend going through this, know that you are a very important part of the transition. Brad was at the Pink Lotus Breast Center, where I was treated, for every minute of the surgeries. We managed to find moments to laugh together. We knew this was the right thing to do for our family and that it would bring us closer. And it has.

For any woman reading this, I hope it helps you to know you have options. I want to encourage every woman, especially if you have a family history of breast or ovarian cancer, to seek out the information and medical experts who can help you through this aspect of your life, and to make your own informed choices.

I acknowledge that there are many wonderful holistic doctors working on alternatives to surgery. My own regimen will be posted in due course on the Web site of the Pink Lotus Breast Center. I hope that this will be helpful to other women.

Breast cancer alone kills some 458,000 people each year, according to the World Health Organization, mainly in low- and middle-income countries. It has got to be a priority to ensure that more women can access gene testing and lifesaving preventive treatment, whatever their means and background, wherever they live. The cost of testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2, at more than $3,000 in the United States, remains an obstacle for many women.

I choose not to keep my story private because there are many women who do not know that they might be living under the shadow of cancer. It is my hope that they, too, will be able to get gene tested, and that if they have a high risk they, too, will know that they have strong options.

Life comes with many challenges. The ones that should not scare us are the ones we can take on and take control of.

Angelina Jolie is an actress and director.

Refuse to be Terrorized — Bruce Schneier

Refuse to be Terrorized

As the details about the bombings in Boston unfold, it’d be easy to be scared. It’d be easy to feel powerless and demand that our elected leaders do something — anything — to keep us safe.

It’d be easy, but it’d be wrong. We need to be angry and empathize with the victims without being scared. Our fears would play right into the perpetrators’ hands — and magnify the power of their victory for whichever goals whatever group behind this, still to be uncovered, has. We don’t have to be scared, and we’re not powerless. We actually have all the power here, and there’s one thing we can do to render terrorism ineffective: Refuse to be terrorized.

It’s hard to do, because terrorism is designed precisely to scare people — far out of proportion to its actual danger. A huge amount of research on fear and the brain teaches us that we exaggerate threats that are rare, spectacular, immediate, random — in this case involving an innocent child — senseless, horrific and graphic. Terrorism pushes all of our fear buttons, really hard, and we overreact.

But our brains are fooling us. Even though this will be in the news for weeks, we should recognize this for what it is: a rare event. That’s the very definition of news: something that is unusual — in this case, something that almost never happens.

Remember after 9/11 when people predicted we’d see these sorts of attacks every few months? That never happened, and it wasn’t because the TSA confiscated knives and snow globes at airports. Give the FBI credit for rolling up terrorist networks and interdicting terrorist funding, but we also exaggerated the threat. We get our ideas about how easy it is to blow things up from television and the movies. It turns out that terrorism is much harder than most people think. It’s hard to find willing terrorists, it’s hard to put a plot together, it’s hard to get materials, and it’s hard to execute a workable plan. As a collective group, terrorists are dumb, and they make dumb mistakes; criminal masterminds are another myth from movies and comic books.

Even the 9/11 terrorists got lucky.

If it’s hard for us to keep this in perspective, it will be even harder for our leaders. They’ll be afraid that by speaking honestly about the impossibility of attaining absolute security or the inevitability of terrorism — or that some American ideals are worth maintaining even in the face of adversity — they will be branded as «soft on terror.» And they’ll be afraid that Americans might vote them out of office. Perhaps they’re right, but where are the leaders who aren’t afraid? What has happened to «the only thing we have to fear is fear itself»?

Terrorism, even the terrorism of radical Islamists and right-wing extremists and lone actors all put together, is not an «existential threat» against our nation. Even the events of 9/11, as horrific as they were, didn’t do existential damage to our nation. Our society is more robust than it might seem from watching the news. We need to start acting that way.

There are things we can do to make us safer, mostly around investigation, intelligence, and emergency response, but we will never be 100-percent safe from terrorism; we need to accept that.

How well this attack succeeds depends much less on what happened in Boston than by our reactions in the coming weeks and months. Terrorism isn’t primarily a crime against people or property. It’s a crime against our minds, using the deaths of innocents and destruction of property as accomplices. When we react from fear, when we change our laws and policies to make our country less open, the terrorists succeed, even if their attacks fail. But when we refuse to be terrorized, when we’re indomitable in the face of terror, the terrorists fail, even if their attacks succeed.

Don’t glorify the terrorists and their actions by calling this part of a «war on terror.» Wars involve two legitimate sides. There’s only one legitimate side here; those on the other are criminals. They should be found, arrested, and punished. But we need to be vigilant not to weaken the very freedoms and liberties that make this country great, meanwhile, just because we’re scared.

Empathize, but refuse to be terrorized. Instead, be indomitable — and support leaders who are as well. That’s how to defeat terrorists.

This essay originally appeared on TheAtlantic.com.
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/04/the-boston-marathon-bombing-keep-calm-and-carry-on/275014/ or http://tinyurl.com/crj3dhk

16 Sneaky Ways You Sabotage Your Own Happiness (And What To Do About It)

16 Sneaky Ways You Sabotage Your Own Happiness (And What To Do About It)
http://www.dumblittleman.com/2013/05/16-sneaky-ways-you-sabotage-your-own.html

16 Sneaky Ways You Sabotage Your Own Happiness (And What To Do About It)

In fact, you try really hard to be happy. But something always seems to come along and ruin everything.

You can’t quite catch a break with your career. It feels like nothing good ever happens in your life.

On most days, your life feels like a bad movie – one where you can’t even get your money back.

Everything just feels miserable.

Can you even remember the last time you actually felt happy?

The Real Causes of Unhappiness

During one summer while I was in university, I was unhappy.

I was unhappy because my friends had better summer jobs than me. I got better grades than them. So why were THEY getting all the cool jobs?

The real low point came when we traded stories on our respective jobs at the end of summer. I found that most of them had key roles in prestigious companies. Some even got to choose which projects to work on, and leveraged that into connections with top executives.

I was jealous.

That’s because I spent the entire summer doing data entry.

So to protect my bruised ego, I told myself how my friends just got lucky, how they had connections I didn’t have, and so on. I spent months thinking such thoughts to make myself feel happier. But in the end that didn’t help.

It didn’t help because nothing had changed. Instead of taking action to improve my job prospects for next summer, I chose to bubble wrap myself in made-up excuses.

I was sabotaging any chance for me to be happy.

The Secret to Being Happy

It took me a while, but I eventually learned that happy people have problems too.

They get into fights with others. They don’t always get lucky breaks, even if they deserve them. And contrary to what we may want to believe, not everything that happens in their lives is good.

But they know the secret to being happy: it’s all in your head.

Happy people have a more proactive and positive view of life.

They believe they have the power to make things better for themselves and others. They believe they are masters of their own destinies. Because of this very attitude, they are not easily brought down by bad things that happen in life.

Finally, happy people don’t make excuses for things they know they should be doing.

It took me a long time to learn this, and even longer to apply it to my own life. My friends got cool jobs because they WORKED for them, while I just complained on the sidelines HOPING to get a cool job.

It was time to stop sabotaging myself with self-defeating thoughts.

15 Warning Signs Your Thinking is Sabotaging Your Happiness

I sabotaged my happiness in a lot of ways that summer. I didn’t realize it at the time, but now I do. And I’ve included some of the warning signs in the list below for you.

Are you sabotaging yourself now as I was?

  1. You blame, always. Do you always point fingers when something goes wrong? Blaming is a subtle sign that you think something or someone else needs to change to make you happy. Living your life depending on what others do is a sure way to be unhappy. Instead, take ownership of what you can control.
  2. You think the world is against you. You feel like you are having the worst day ever, and the whole world is trying to screw you over. Or is it just your imagination? Go ahead and vent your frustration for the rest of the day. But stop before you go to bed. Tomorrow is a new day. Let’s not tarnish it with bad thoughts that are already in the past.
  3. You feel like no one cares. Here’s an interesting thought: do YOU care about others? Instead of feeling sorry for yourself because you think no one cares, do something today to show your care for someone. Call a friend to say hello. Help out a neighbor. Do a nice deed for someone. What goes around comes around.
  4. You take everything personally. I know friends who take whatever others say about them personally. As a result, some days they are over-the-moon ecstatic about a positive comment. Other times they are miserable because someone critiqued what they did. Keep in mind what other people think is none of your business. They are entitled to their opinion. You are entitled to not listen.
  5. You relish in getting back at people. Do you keep grudges? Do you look forward to the day when you can get back at someone who has wronged you in the past? This sort of thinking will only drown you in a pool of negative thoughts. Learn to let go. There are much better things to do with your time than to spend it feeling bitter and resentful.
  6. You feel like you have something to prove. I had a friend who always tried to prove how tough he was at school. The truth was, the harder he tried to prove himself, the more desperate and ridiculous he looked. This spiraled into a vicious cycle where he would be unhappy with himself, and thus try harder and harder to prove something to others. As for you, you don’t need to prove anything. You are good enough as you are. You just need to believe in yourself.
  7. You are harsh when others screw up because they “deserve it”. I have a colleague who eagerly goes out of his way to make those who screwed up suffer for it. He felt it is his “right” to treat others that way because others treated him so when he first started. Not surprisingly, my colleague seems equally as miserable as those he torments. Do you think pouring salt on someone else’s wound will make you happy? I highly doubt it. Instead, learn to forgive. What has happened is already in the past. Holding onto unhappy memories is a sure way to stay unhappy.
  8. You feel life is unfair. Someone else is always getting the credit, the boy/girl, the big raise, and everything good. Yes, the world is unfair in some ways. What are you going to DO about it? Remember how I said happy people are proactive and positive? Losers complain all day and yet DO NOTHING about their miserable situation. But you’re not a loser, right? Learn new skills, try new adventures, and improve yourself as much as possible. If you do that, pretty soon you’ll be the one getting all the good things in life while everyone else looks on.
  9. You feel it is OK to cheat. This is often tied to the feeling that life is unfair. If you think that way, it’s easy to rationalize cheating as a way to “balance” things out. Of course, we all start with small cheats. And if we don’t get caught, we go for bigger and bigger payoffs over time. Can you see how this is a dangerous slippery slope? Cheating may bring you short-time happiness, but it guarantees long-term misery. Instead, focus on producing work that you are proud of. Focus on building relationships based on trust, care, and love. Focus on doing what’s best for you and others, rather than what feels good at the moment.
  10. You love to complain. Oh, how good it feels to play the “woe is me” card in front of your friends. I’ve been there and done that! For a brief moment, you are the center of attention. Everyone is listening to your gripe story. Everyone takes pity on you. Then your friends start to tune out your constant complaining. Desperate to regain their attention, you come up with even sadder stories of how your life sucks. Have you ever stopped to listen and be there for others? If you haven’t, why do you think others will do the same for you?
  11. You think you have it bad in life. Stop living in your own little world. There are others around you who are much less fortunate. Relatively speaking, maybe your life isn’t so bad after all. Sometimes when I’m having a bad day, I would complain how I don’t have this or that in life. What always helps is to remind ourselves the things we have to be grateful for in life. Think: what can you be grateful for in your life?
  12. You’re jealous whenever something good happens to your friends. Sure, you may SAY you’re happy for them. But are you really? Or do you secretly resent their newfound happiness? I have learned that being happy for others can create a corresponding lift in your mood. Everyone’s life is different. The timing of your happiness has nothing to do with your friend’s timing. Be happy and celebrate your friend’s bright moment. In time, you will have your own. And your friend will be there to celebrate yours then.
  13. You think nobody likes you. The ironic thing is, your thinking nobody likes you will make you appear cold and uncaring. This only results in people actually disliking you. Instead, give time for people to get to know you. Be warm and friendly. Yes, there will always be the odd person who doesn’t like you for whatever reason. Let that go. Don’t let them skew your perception of others who do accept you for who you are.
  14. You bully others. I don’t claim to know how bullies think. But I do know one important fact: happy people don’t bully others. Happy people feel good and confident about themselves. They do not push others down in order to lift themselves up.
  15. You tell yourself you don’t deserve good things. This is the quintessential defeatist attitude. When something good does happen to you, you think it’s luck and not your own doing. Maybe you need to give yourself some credit. Before you can be happy about your life, you have to believe that you deserve happiness. Once you start to believe something, you’ll begin to see it happen.
The Final Warning Sign (#16)

Go back to the list above and look at the various points again. How many of them apply to you? More importantly, does the following, final warning sign apply to you?

You would rather talk than to take action.

You may nod your head as you sheepishly check off on the previous warning signs. But will you actually TAKE ACTION to change things? Not taking action is a sure way to sabotage yourself, stay stuck, and be unhappy.

I wish I could tell you an epic, Hollywood-like conclusion for my summer job story. No, I didn’t get a spectacular job offer the following year. In fact, the rest of my summer jobs throughout university were pretty normal.

But I did learn how to be happy.

That’s because I made the effort to change how I think. The transformation didn’t happen overnight.

But each time I complained or let a negative thought creep into my head, I would push it back out. Slowly, I embraced the notion that I have the power to change and improve my life.

Happiness Begins with You

You have a choice.

You can spend the rest of your life feeling miserable. You can complain to anyone within earshot, eventually pushing even your closest supporters away.

You can lash out at the world because you feel someone or something “owes” you a happier life.

Or you can choose to be happy.

All it takes is for you to view things differently. Believe that you have the power to create happiness in your life. Know that you deserves better. Trust that it will all work out.

You can do this.

What are you waiting for?

5 Automator workflows everyone should have

5 Automator workflows everyone should have
http://www.macworld.com/article/2038095/5-automator-workflows-everyone-should-have.html

favicons?domain=www.macworld.com MACWORLD17 Hours Ago

5 Automator workflows everyone should have

by Ben Waldie

I meet a lot of people with Automator anxiety: they think using OS X’s built-in workflow-maker is a lot more complex than it really is. The truth is that Automator workflows are (a) pretty simple to assemble and (b) great for simple but repetitive tasks that you do all the time anyway.

To show you what I mean here are five workflows that I think pretty much every Mac user should have. They do things we all need to do: Wrap text in quotation marks, for example, or count the number of words in a selection of text. There might be other ways of doing the same things, but Automator is built into your Mac and you can implement them yourself for free in a couple of minutes.

Wrap text in quotes

-18176487834149519250-read.jpeg

This one works with selected text to wrap it in quotation marks.

To start, create a new Automator Service workflow and configure its header area to process selected text in any application. Click the Output Replaces Selected Text checkbox so the result of the workflow—the wrapped text—will be inserted in place of your selection.

Although Automator includes a number of actions for working with text, it doesn’t have one for adding a prefix or a suffix. As a workaround, you’ll need to use AppleScript for this. So, add the Run AppleScript action to the workflow, and copy-and-paste in the following script, which simply adds quotation marks around any text input it receives:

on run {input, parameters} return "\"" & (input as string) & "\"" end run

Save the finished workflow as Text > Wrap in Quotes and you’re done.

The next time you’re ready to wrap some text in quotation marks, just Control- or right-click the selection and choose Text > Wrap in Quotes. (You could also choose the workflow from the Application > Services menu.)

Count words of selected text

-6017172153100309690-read.jpeg

Another one for working with selected text, this one gives you a quick word count.

Create a new Automator Service workflow and set it to process selected text in any application. Leave the Output Replaces Selected Text checkbox unchecked.

Automator doesn’t have any built-in actions for counting words. So, again, you’ll have to add the Run AppleScript action to the workflow, and enter the following:

on run {input, parameters} set theWordCount to count words of (input as string) display dialog (theWordCount & " words in the selected text." as string) end run

Save the workflow as Text > Display Word Count. Next time you want to know the length of some text, just select it and run the workflow from the Services menu.

Create subfolder

73577279433097506700-read.jpeg

Although it would be super useful, OS X still lacks a handy Add Subfolder command in the Finder. Sure, you can open a folder first, and then create another folder inside of it, but that’s one more step than necessary.

Create a new Automator Service workflow and set it to process folders in Finder.

Find the Set Value of Variable action and add it to the workflow. Then, from its popup menu, create a new variable and name it Folder.

After that, add the New Folder action to the workflow. Enter a name of Subfolder or whatever else you prefer. Drag the folder variable from the Variable area at the bottom of the workflow to the Where popup. Finally, with the action selected, choose Action > Ignore Input from the menu bar. This is important because the New Folder action copies anything it receives as input into the new folder, and you don’t want this to happen. By setting the action to ignore its input, you bypass this behavior.

Save the workflow as Folder > Create Subfolder. The workflow should now appear under Services in the Finder’s contextual menu when you Control or right-click on a folder. Just select a folder and then the service.

Add date to files

11819528907006877840-read.jpeg

This one adds a current date prefix to the names of any selected files or folders.

Create a new Automator Service workflow and set it to process files or folders in Finder. Find the Rename Finder Items action and drag it to the workflow. If Automator prompts you to insert a Copy Finder Items action first to preserve your originals, click Don’t Add; you’re just adding a prefix to the names of the files, not deleting them or anything serious like that.

Configure the action to Add Date or Time. Then set the Date/Time popup to Current, the Format popup to Year Month Day, the Where popup to Before name, the first Separator popup to Dash, the second Separator popup to Space, and click the Use Leading Zeros checkbox. While all of this sounds kind of complicated, it’s really just telling Automator you want the date prefix in YYYY-MM-DD format.

Lastly, save the workflow as Files and Folder > Add Date Prefix. Your workflow now shows up in the Finder’s Services menu when you Control- or right-click on something. Select a file or folder, then select the service, and the date will be prepended.

Toggle hidden files

2650042530484251390-read.jpeg

Sometimes it helps to see hidden system files; this one toggles their visibility on and off.

Start by creating a new Automator Application workflow. Automator doesn’t have an action for toggling on and off the visibility of hidden files, so again you’ll need to use AppleScript to do it. Actually, this AppleScript really just triggers a bunch of Unix commands to update the Finder’s preferences to show hidden files and then relaunch the Finder. Add the Run AppleScript action to your workflow, and enter the following:

if {"OFF", "FALSE"} contains (do shell script "defaults read com.apple.finder AppleShowAllFiles") then set theValue to "TRUE" else set theValue to "FALSE" end if do shell script ("defaults write com.apple.finder AppleShowAllFiles " & theValue) as string do shell script "killall Finder"

(When you copy and paste, make sure that the first line, beginning «if» and ending «then», and the sixth, beginning «do» and ending «as string» are each a single line, with no hard returns in the middle.) Just save the workflow as Finder > Toggle Hidden Files. That done, if you double-click that app, your Finder will disappear for a second, then reappear with hidden files showing or hidden (depending on their state before you launched the app). (And be careful with those hidden files: They usually do important stuff, and deleting or renaming them could get you into trouble.)