agosto | 2012 | @juanvalera

http://www.riskmanagementmonitor.com/steve-jobs-lessons-on-risk/

Morgan O’Rourke: What was it about Steve Jobs that made him, and by extension Apple, so successful?

Walter Isaacson: I think there were certain secrets to his success. The most important was focus. He was able to filter out all distractions. For example, when he comes back to Apple in 1997, they’re making 60 different products. He finally stands at a whiteboard and makes a four-square grid that says: home, office, laptop, desktop. He says, “We’re going to make four computers and cancel everything else.” And that focus really got Apple back on track.

Likewise, simplicity was another one of the lessons. He felt that you had to really understand the depth of engineering of a product to make it simple. For example, with the iPod, he insisted that you be able to get whatever you wanted with only three clicks. The engineers kept saying “we can’t do it,” and he would find ways to show them how it could be done.

O’Rourke: Can other companies duplicate his management style or was it more unique to Jobs and Apple in general?

Isaacson: People mistakenly think that his management style was just about being rough on people. He had rough edges, but the key was that he inspired people. I get frustrated when people say he was such a jerk. They’re missing that he was also compelling, charismatic and inspiring. It’s dangerous to think that being rough on employees is the only way to succeed. Instead, his success came from driving employees to do things that they didn’t know they could do.

O’Rourke: Key person risk is an important concern for many companies, probably none more so than Apple. So how do you think Apple will fare as it transitions to life without Jobs?

Isaacson: I think that a combination of [Apple top executives] Tim Cook, Jony Ive, Phil Schiller, Eddy Cue and others can, in total, bring the passion for product that Steve had, which is why Apple is still doing so well. I think that he ingrained in the company his ability to combine art with technology, and everybody there gets that. They all believe in making beautiful, well-designed, aesthetic products. However, when he left Apple the first time, the company did fine for four or five years and started failing. The danger is not that it will start failing now but will it be strong five to ten years from now?

O’Rourke: For a company that is considered extremely innovative, Apple also seemed somewhat risk-averse in that it didn’t pioneer new technologies like mp3 players or smartphones, but rather followed other companies into the market before eventually surpassing them. Was this strategy emblematic of Jobs’ personal risk appetite?

Isaacson:The risk that he took was in doing things that other people thought would not succeed. Not that he got the technology first, but rather that he put it together and decided that a portable music player, for instance, would transform the music industry when everybody else was saying, “Well, other companies are making mp3 players and they stink.” So it wasn’t like he invented the music player. It is just that he pushed the notion by making them really great so he could transform the experience.

O’Rourke: So the risk wasn’t in creating something new but in making something that already existed better?

Isaacson: Right. He would call it “betting the company” on a strategy. It wasn’t like they were going to make 40 peripheral products and see which one worked. They bet the farm on the iPod, which was the first real peripheral they built, and they bet the farm on the iPhone. He was able to package these new devices in a very artistic and appealing way. Sony was trying to make mp3 players, and Microsoft was trying to make tablets. But none of them had the passion to make them really well and to just bet that if you made a great one you would be able to sell it for more than anyone else and sell more copies.

O’Rourke: In addition to Steve Jobs, you have also written biographies on Albert Einstein, Benjamin Franklin, Henry Kissinger and others. Do you see any similarities between these iconic individuals and Jobs? What can business leaders can learn from them?

Isaacson: What they all do is think rebelliously. They think out of the box. Einstein made the leap that time is relative depending on your state of motion. That’s an out-of-the-box leap. You can’t see it, there is no evidence, and it doesn’t make logical sense at first. But he does it as a patent clerk in 1905, it takes about nine years for the rest of the physics community catch up and it’s a pillar of 20th century science.

Steve thought out of the box by saying let’s not do something conventional, let’s come up with new ideas. Think different, as he put it. That’s what set all of those guys apart was that they had an unconventional way of seeing things. That served them to make imaginative leaps.

Now and then someone will come up to me when I talk about Einstein and thinking out of the box and they will say to me, “I’m like Einstein. I’m a good leader because I think out of the box.” And I tell them it helps to know what’s in the box before you learn how to think out of the box. Sometimes when you do something differently, it’s not going to work. You have to make sure that if you’re doing it differently it will work better, not worse.

Stop Wasting Your Boss’s Time

It’s easy to complain about a manager who wastes time. It’s much harder to see how you might misuse that manager’s time. Here are three ways to minimize the impact you have on your supervisor’s tight schedule:

Self-delegate. Avoid requesting her intervention too often. If you or one of your direct reports can accomplish the task without your boss’s help, do it.
Present solutions, not problems. Don’t bring problems to your boss to solve. Instead, bring proposed solutions, and seek his feedback.
Accommodate her working style. For example, if she prefers to receive information in writing rather than in person, honor those preferences even if it’s not your style.